Pyramid Structures Or Just Hype?
- MuseumofTarot
- Mar 23
- 5 min read
Everybody's asking me about the pyramid structures. It's on Rogan now, and when the stoners pick up on it, you know it's over. You know that it's just gonna get twisted into oblivion.
Joe Rogan: "People are full of shit and that story sucks."
So I've got, the studies that were released by these guys. The guys that were releasing this material, were Italian scientists, Biondi and Malanga. And there's a problem with that. And that's because Malanga is kind of a Stephen Greer for Italy. The official press release that was done for this - and anybody can issue a press release, we can issue a press release at Museum of Tarot for anything we want - was done through this YouTube site: Expedition with Nicole Ciccolo, it'sa me, Mario.
You can go to the Expedition YouTube site right now, and you can take a look at Italian Goddess Queen Egypt lady right here. And you can take a look at this YouTube site and find that it's a bunch of witch-tok woo. It's a bunch of Stephen Greer, Billy Carson woo nonsense. And you'll see that this is mixed in with a whole bunch of stuff that I would consider very questionable.
And you can see the releases that they had right here. They're translated into English, you can sit and and watch what she says. But nowhere during any of it, if you click through any of this, will you find the actual research that is supposed to be published about this. What they did is very much like Stephen Greer did with all his press releases, disclosures at the National Press Club: they rented out a room at a venue in Bologna, Italy. You'd have to pay to get into this venue, pay to go to this event. And they sold the room out, so they made their money off of it just doing the event. Apparently these guys got up and they presented information about these structures under the pyramids and things within the pyramid using this new type of synthetic aperture radar tomography.
Okay. They haven't published that research yet, I haven't been able to find it anywhere. Because I looked for like two hours looking for this thing and I can read Italian so I wasn't able to even find it on any Italian sites. This event was done on the 15th and 16th. So far it's been a week and the actual scientific document that you know, the peer review study has not been released anywhere that I can find. And the actual research that was published was one paper back in 2022 about supposedly finding structures within the Great pyramid. (Full study linked below).
There are three pyramids on the the Giza Plateau. Three main pyramids, I should say three of the larger pyramids. You've got the great pyramid is the northernmost, you've got the pyramid in the center and then the pyramid down below. The one that they're talking about right now, that's all over social media is the center pyramid. But this was the research that was done on the great pyramid. Supposedly they came out, they did this synthetic aperture radar tomography on that great pyramid, and they found structures, all of these structures within. Okay. Sounds great. Sounds awesome. I'm, I'm all for it. I've long believed that there were more structures within the pyramid being covered up by people like Zahi Hawas. But when you actually look at what they're publishing, these are the scans and they're claiming that these correlate to these.
They're claiming that this is actually this, and with structures that we do know that are in the great pyramids, such as these in the king's chamber with the vaults above it. We know that it's there and we see that their scans don't even show it. This is the actual scan, and you can see the overlay where they fade it out to show the scan, and supposedly this structure is right here.
Do you see it? Because I don't even see the structure that we know is there. This does not correlate with this. This is nonsense. This is just, this is nonsense data. You can see it with the other structures. So if this is what they're using to claim that this exists by overlaying a fanciful artist, rendition of this over this and saying, "don't you see it guys? Really, it's there. Look." Using the propensity of the human mind to find patterns and see things based on suggestibility, based on, "Hey, don't you see that? Don't you see it there? I swear it's there. We did the scans."
I don't see it. I just don't and I have a problem with this. And when you're claiming that there's this much going on based on scans that are very questionable, that don't really show anything with high enough resolution to tell if there's anything there, you're looking at, you're looking at fuzz, you're looking at nonsense. You can point as many arrows as you want to the fuzz and the nonsense, but that doesn't, that's not clear to me at all.
They haven't released the paper with the spirals underneath the pyramids that I have been able to find. If it is the same kind of data as this, if it's the same kind of scans as this, I find that highly questionable. This doesn't work for me. I'd like it to work. I think they're making a lot of shit up and overlaying it on bullshit scans.
If you looked up this guy's work, he's very much into Steven Greer, Billy Carson stuff. He is very much, alien abduction, giants and pushing Atlantis stories like one of these other yahoos. So I find him questionable. Biondi, I'm not sure, but Malanga... go look for yourselves. Go look this paper up, check it out yourselves. (You don't have to, just scroll to the end to find it).
I get that we're a woo crowd, but I like to think that the crowd for Museum of Tarot is grounded in reality. We're professionals and educated people that have a little bit of woo in us, and I like to think that we're not so much the witch-tok crowd. We're the more grounded and looking for actual data and actual research we can bite our teeth into. But I think that the fact that how many people are jumping on the bandwagon on social media, the very questionable social media accounts that are pushing this right now on X, et cetera, I think those people are full of shit. I think they're pushing something prematurely that doesn't actually have the basis of proof, publicly available at least.
I would love to be proven wrong. I would love for this to come out and we to see that this is exactly what they're claiming. That would be awesome. I'm just saying that I find it questionable at this point, at this stage right now on March 22nd, 2025, I find it very questionable.
